Given the never-ending battle between the "Engineers" and the "Believers" over whether we can actually hear differences, or if, in the absence of measurement, double-blind testing, and such, it's all just "voodoo", here's a story that some of you may find interesting:
When I was just a kid in a High School physics class, I saw a demonstration of something that, as near as I have been able to determine, is still not fully explained: The teacher was talking about capacitors, and explained that a capacitor is an energy-storage device formed whenever any two conductors (the "plates") are separated by any non-conductor (the "dielectric"). When a charge is applied to either plate, he went on, as long as there is a difference in potential (voltage) on the plates, the other plate will also charge until the charge intensity on both plates is equal. Not all of the available charging energy, he continued, will appear at the plates, however; some portion of it will be stored, to be released under circumstances that he said he would explain later.
To demonstrate this, he pulled out and set on the demonstration bench, an odd wood and metal device and a (perhaps12Volt, I simply don't remember) battery. The wood-and-metal thingy consisted of three pieces: (a) two separate four or five inch long pieces of what looked like broom handle, each centered at one end on a five or six inch diameter thin piece of metal (that sort of looked like a cut-out tin can lid) to form (if held vertically) a "T" shaped structure, with the broom handle piece as the vertical member and the metal piece (the "plate") as the cross-member (b) a "U" shaped (but flat-bottomed) wooden structure consisting of three pieces of (probably) 1 inch thick by 6 inches wide board, arranged as two 5 or 6 inch tall vertical members mounted at the ends of a similar-length horizontal member. Each of the vertical members of the U-shaped "mount" had a V-shaped notch cut into its top edge so that one of the broom-handle pieces could be set across it and held in place, and each of the broom-handle pieces had been drilled through its long axis so that a wire could be passed through it and attached to the metal "plate" at its end and the other end of the wire could be run a couple of feet to an alligator clip for attachment to the battery.
The final piece of equipment was an "electroscope" - a very simple test instrument used to test for and indicate the presence of an electric charge. The particular kind used was a "gold leaf" electroscope, which, in its least complex form, uses two small pieces of gold leaf fixed to the end of a conducting rod, with the leaves protected by a glass bell and the rod projecting beyond the glass to act as the "detector". When this detector is brought near or touched to a charged object, electrons will be picked up and transferred through the rod to the gold leaves which, thus becoming charged with the same polarity, repel each other and visibly spread apart. When no charge is present, the leaves just hang limp.
To start the demonstration, the teacher put the two "T-handle" pieces on the "U" mount so that the handles were horizontal, held in place by the notched boards, and the two metal plates were facing each other close together, but not touching - perhaps an eighth of an inch apart. He then, using the alligator clips at the ends of the wires, attached the two wires coming off the T-handles to the battery; one wire to the positive (+) terminal and one to the negative (-) terminal. After a moment, he disconnected the two alligator clips and, holding them out, asked the class what we thought would happen if he were to touch them together. When nobody knew, he brought the two clips together and we were rewarded with an audible "snap" and a clearly visible spark.
The spark, he said, happened because, when he attached the wires to the battery, the capacitor charged and continued to hold its charge even after the wires had been disconnected. When he later touched the wires together, the capacitor discharged, he said, producing the spark and the sound. To prove that the capacitor (the two t-handles and the [dielectric] space between them) was discharged after the spark, he checked it with the electroscope and, sure enough, the gold leaves showed no movement at all. Then he re-charged the capacitor by reattaching the wires to the battery, and again disconnecting them, so that there could be no continuing energy from that source. When he checked the capacitor again, the leaves of the electroscope sprang wide apart, indicating the presence of a strong charge.
Then came the really interesting part of the demonstration: Taking the capacitor apart, he lifted one of the T-handles off the U mount and checked it by holding the electroscope to its plate, then, handing it to one of the students, he had the student carry it off to one of the far corners of the room. Then he did the same thing with the other T-handle - checking its plate and having another student carry it off to the other far corner of the room. Finally, he passed the electroscope through the space between the vertical members of the U mount that had included the (air) dielectric for the capacitor. None of the three things checked - neither the two plates nor the space that had been the dielectric - showed any evidence of charge at all, and when the teacher asked us where we thought the charge had gone, not one of us had even the slightest clue, although we agreed that it had gone completely.
The teacher then asked the students holding the T- handles to bring them back and place them back into the U mount in their original (capacitor) positions. When that was done, he asked us to tell him what we thought would happen if he, once again, touched the two wires together. We had all seen that nothing was charged, so naturally we all agreed that nothing would happen. Imagine our surprise when, touching them together, he got the same spark and "snap" as before.
What we has just seen, he told us, was one of the great continuing mysteries of science: We know, he said, that capacitors store energy; we know that they store it in their dielectric; and, if we know the dielectric material, its dielectric constant, and the amounts and voltages involved, we can accurately predict exactly how much energy they will store. We even know that the storage involves the electrostatic fields created by the charging voltages and we know how to calculate them, but despite all that knowledge, NO ONE, he said HAS ANY IDEA AT ALL WHERE THE MISSING CHARGES WENT OR HOW THEY GOT THERE!
Now that was half a century ago, and the teacher was only a high school teacher, and it may be that those mysteries have now been solved - or may even have been solved back then. Frankly, it doesn't matter. Regardless of what the answer is, there's still a lesson to be learned here: Possibly it's that there are things out there that really exist and that we can really use even if we don't fully understand them. Possibly it's that there are things that we can measure that we don't understand. Possibly it's the opposite - that there are things that, because we don't understand them, we don't know how to properly measure. Possibly it's something else, entirely. What do you think?