One of the things I remember about my old days as an audiophile, before I ever started writing for the audiophile press, is that, whenever I and my pals sat around bullshooting the latest toys and goodies there was -- at least conversationally -- never any middle ground: Everything was either "Wonderful; the latest and greatest" or it was "dogmeat." To our delicate sensibilities (or at least to our flapping lips), no other possibility existed or was even necessary, and we freely embraced or mercilessly attacked everything, either in our system or on the market, as if we were the gods of creation and it was our divine right to enshrine or destroy whatever came before us.
Apparently a lot of people out there - audiophiles, and even seasoned music industry and electronics professionals -- still believe they have that divine right and still, although the words may no longer be "wonderful" or "dogmeat", apply it with gusto to practically every audiophile issue. Every day, on the internet, I see some kind of comment about some thing or even some entire category of things that does just what we used to do -- reduces the subject at hand to either purest good ("white", for purposes of this article) or purest not-good ("black"), and gleefully ignores everything in the middle.
You know what I'm talking about: It's the sort of blanket statement or intimation that absolutely all (take your pick) digital; analog; tubes; transistors; cables; "tweaks"; this kind of loudspeaker driver or that one; this kind of recording format, or digital conversion algorithm, or computer software, or that one; even this kind of listener or that one - in short, practically anything at all within the scope of this great hobby of ours -- is either "wonderful" or "dogmeat".
When I and my friends were doing it, we were just exuberant and verbally sloppy. In our heart of hearts, though, we knew that there could be a middle ground; we were just too lazy or having too much fun to go and look for it. Nowadays, I wonder if other people are doing the same as we did, but, frankly, in many cases I doubt it.
Perhaps what I'm seeing is just trolls, who will attack anything at all, just for the thrill and the blood of it, and don't much care about what's really true. Perhaps the people on the other side are just zealots, who will support their possessions, their positions, or their "team", regardless of anything, and also don't care much about the truth. If that's the case, it's fine with me: They're having fun, and that's what a hobby is for. Good for them!
What worries me, though, is thinking that there might be people out there who AREN'T playing, but who simply don't understand that there can be more to things than just "black" and "white". People who, whether for lack of training; lack of experience; lack of perception; or just sheer intellectual laziness, might actually come to the conclusion that (just to cite an extreme example), because it's possible to tell a lie in the English language, nothing at all in the English language should ever be believed!
The fact of it is that, for practically everything, reality is not an "on/off" or "either/or" switch, but a "bell curve", with (given enough total samples in the statistical population) a few extremely "black" examples at one end of the curve and a few extremely "white" examples at the other, and all the rest -- by far the overwhelming majority -- are shades of "grey"; neither extreme in one way nor the other, but just more or less "average", and not "extremely" anything at all
Contrary to what is all too often seen on the Internet (and sometimes even in print), practically nothing is either purely black or purely white: All High End audio is NOT "voodoo" or a calculated rip-off. Neither is it all wonderful or worth its sometimes astronomical pricing. It's possible to build a crappy product out of either tubes or transistors. Digital does not automatically sound worse than analog or vice versa. It's possible for cables and other "tweaks" to be strong contributors to a great system; to do nothing at all; or even, as is so often and so loudly claimed, to be nothing more than wildly overpriced scams, shamelessly taking money from the innocent and the overly-trusting. In actuality, there's a broad range of performance, technology, quality, and value in almost everything, and even if there weren't, there would still be huge variances in what people perceive, like, and are willing or able to buy.
When we're just playing with our pals, team spirit, tunnel vision, or outright attack-dog trolling may be just fine, but when we post something for others to read, maybe we should remember that among those who see it there might be people looking for real advice or for help in making a buying decision. How are they supposed to know the difference between what's valid and what's just players playing? And, given the importance of reviews and "word of mouth" commentary (either amateur or professional), to the success of a manufacturer or a product, shouldn't we - just to keep the flow of toys and goodies coming - at least TRY to keep our thinking critical and our conclusions fair?
After all, the only things that are really "black and white" are the colors, black and white.